A quick message from the centre ground:
Sims have two goals - immersion and content. The former to provide the best possible moment-to-moment experience, the latter to keep that experience fresh and relevant for as wide a player base as possible. So far so uncontroversial, right? Of course both CloD and BoS offer increased immersion over Il2 - with the improved graphics, sound, physics etc. The same 'of course' doesn't apply to player preferences. Largely, I think, this is because the content isn't persuasive. However, one day the content of these new sims will match what we privileged Il2 pilots have become used to (which is why it's essential devs open up their games to be as mod friendly as possible). At this point any new sim will be better than an old one. Till that point each player will sit on a spectrum between immersion and content, and they'll become a convert to the new when the balance of the two suits their preferences. Which is a good thing.
To worry.about BoS now is silly. I couldn't give a hoot about its first crack at an SP campaign. It's being developed for a particular market, to which I don't belong, but in the future it will offer things I want. Can we ease off on the pissing contest and move on to providing useful information? Il2 (read 'the Il2 modding community') is totally sodding incredible. One day we'll all be saying the same about a new sim, and nothing will have been lost along the way.
Screwy