I read a lot about pilots and theyre plane. Many many things are written about the spitfire, But it is very hard to get a pilot beyond the tale of what a wonderful plane it was.
The best description I manage to find was from FFA Pilots flying noumerous airplanes inclusive Corsair. These pilots say something interesting about The Seafire.
It was the fastest climber of them all but the worst gunplatform and landingperformance of them all . I guess the lightness and nimble aircraft is niot that good weaponplatform.
And why the English Navy was not that afraid of taking the corsair into service despite its bad landing accident reputation
Hi, the reason for the inclusion of the Cosrair in the FAA was more that the Hellcat's production were being absorbed by the USN. But the Brit's manged to work out how to land the Corsair, with a curved aproach and an educated guese for the final bit after it had been rejected by the USN for carrier operations. That long nose restricted landing visability badly. It was kind of a furtuitive Hobson's Choice for the Royal Navy.
Surprised though about the comments about the Spit at a gun-platform, it was always a good plane to shoot from and the Corsair, had decided exentricities in it's handling. A good pilots plane that took a lot of controling, but when masterd these could be harnesed and was exelent, but not a plane for the inexperinced.
Right about the Spit's landing gear, under carriage colapse was common on airfeild, never mind carriers.
Alban