Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8]   Go Down

Author Topic: Bf-109T-1 and T-2 (4.09 ; 4.10(.1) ; 4.11.1)  (Read 33883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 958
Re: Bf-109T-1 and T-2 (4.09 ; 4.10(.1) ; 4.11.1)
« Reply #84 on: April 15, 2014, 06:37:39 PM »

I wanted to get this working in HSFX 7.0.2 and was not sure what all was needed.  Sooooooo I tried the 4.09 version and it loads, I see the plane in gui, hit fly and there is no cockpit, expected....

I hit F2 and I can see all the 109T flying around T1/T2's and they play like they should except for player aircraft..... duh...

When this starts what cockpit is the files looking for I have the GW 109 cockpits but I'm not sure which one should go in the 3do file and how it should be named.  I figured it should be the E-7 but it doesn't work. 

I had all this working in HSFX 5.xxx and didn't use half of the stuff required for 4.11 in the thread.....................

Any help would be appreciated. 



  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 223
Re: Bf-109T-1 and T-2 (4.09 ; 4.10(.1) ; 4.11.1)
« Reply #85 on: July 20, 2014, 03:27:17 AM »

In fact I created that plane for 4.09 and 4.10 versions (especially UP2 and UP3). Little by little, some programmers were able to adapt this mod for 4.11 and then 4.12 versions.

Now, if you want to get those planes, you can download the Bf-109 Ultimate pack for 4.12 that contains Better Tonies : http://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,37634.0.html.

I mean cockpit, external 3d and texture improvements.


  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 186
Re: Bf-109T-1 and T-2 (4.09 ; 4.10(.1) ; 4.11.1)
« Reply #86 on: August 01, 2019, 07:27:30 AM »

I know this is an old topic, but I wonder whether this 109 would have been suitable for a carrier, especially giving it's small landing gear and forward view while taxiing.


  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48
Re: Bf-109T-1 and T-2 (4.09 ; 4.10(.1) ; 4.11.1)
« Reply #87 on: August 14, 2019, 07:23:05 PM »

especially giving it's small landing gear

I think that right there is the biggest problem...The landing gear.  I understand that the 109 was built with it's narrow track landing gear (When people bash it, I love to call it "Spitfire Style" landing gear) for reasons, including the ability to just detach the wings in the field so you could roll it up on a rail car for transport, swap wings easily, etc...

However I think this basically means that you're stuck with narrow gear, and you can't do anything to change it.

View while taxing, well, maybe actually better than radials.  The short range certainly couldn't help it, it's basically limited to local carrier defense.  I think the only reason the 109T got any development work done at all was that it was all they had at the time.  That said, a carrier based 190 would have probably been a much better option.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8]   Go Up

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 26 queries.